The Gap Chess Club
Handicap Lightning Prize Night for 2010
28 January 2011
GROUP A
|
No. |
Player |
Rating |
Hcap |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|
1 |
Debbie Jenkins |
1396 |
1.0 |
X |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
2 |
Tony Howes |
1423 |
0.5 |
0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
3 |
Greg Colwell |
1057 |
2.5 |
1 |
0 |
X |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Russell Lyons |
1210 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
5 |
Peter Hiller |
1157 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
X |
1 |
2 |
|
6 |
John Ryland |
unrated |
2.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
X |
0 |
GROUP B
|
No. |
Player |
Rating |
Hcap |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
|
1 |
Kieran Lyons |
1527 |
0.0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
2 |
Nathan Shaw |
1365 |
1.0 |
0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
3 |
Andrew Robinson |
1455 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
4 |
James Hiller |
613 |
6.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
X |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
Ray Adams |
1319 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
X |
0 |
* Note 1: James Hillers handicap of 6.5 given in error should have been 4.0
* Note 2: Peter Hillers handicap should have been 2.0
SEMI-FINALS
Debbie Jenkins Nathan Shaw 1-0
Kieran Lyons Tony Howes 1-0
Third Place Match
Nathan Shaw Tony Howes 0-1
FINAL
Debbie Jenkins Kieran Lyons 0-1
CONSOLATION MATCHES
5-8 Classification
Semi-F Andrew Robinson Russell Lyons 1-0
Semi-F Greg Colwell James Hiller 0-1
5-6 Match Andrew Robinson James Hiller 1-0
7-8 Match Greg Colwell Russell Lyons 1-0
9-12 Classification
Semi-F Peter Hiller BYE
Semi-F Ray Adams John Ryland 1-0
9-10 Match Peter Hiller Ray Adams 0-1
11-12 Match John Ryland BYE
FINAL RANKINGS
|
No. |
Player |
|
1 |
Kieran Lyons |
|
2 |
Debbie Jenkin |
|
3 |
Tony Howes |
|
4 |
Nathan Shaw |
|
5 |
Andrew Robinson |
|
6 |
James Hiller |
|
7 |
Greg Colwell |
|
8 |
Russell Lyons |
|
9 |
Ray Adams |
|
10 |
Peter Hiller |
|
11 |
John Ryland |
For a full account of Prize Night 2010, read the related news article.
Handicapping notes:
Handicaps were awarded as follows:
0.0 Over 1500
0.5 1400 to 1499
1.0 1300 to 1399
1.5 1200 to 1299
2.0 1100 to 1199
2.5 1000 to 1099
3.0 900 to 999
3.5 800 to 899
4.0 799 or under
Unrated players were given a provisional rating (marked above with an asterisk)
If the difference between the players was, the time controls were:
0.0 5min v 5min
0.5 5min v 4min&30sec
1.0 5min v 4min
1.5 5min v 3min&30sec
2.0 5min v 3min
2.5 5min v 2min&30sec
3.0 5min v 2min
3.5 5min v 1min&30sec
4.0 or more 5min v 1min
[Prize Night tournament main page]